Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ashley Striblet, PhD's avatar

1. “research takes months” is (thankfully) not true . It can take just an hour to talk to a few people about your idea. So it seems like this is already being built on a strawman or maybe trying to help companies justify why they haven’t invested in research in the past.

2. Large companies definitely need to figure out how to cut the cost and time of recruitment ( it truly is the real bottle neck in research), but I’m not sure why you wouldnt want to invest that time savings into actually talking to your customers? It’s literally the highest leverage thing you can do.

Overall,

I think leveraged for certain parts of the workflow and certain studies this can be powerful, but I can see this just leading to a lot of research theater that doesn’t lead to companies making better decisions.

And until I think they are able to show any evidence of that, it’s hard to be bullish on these types of companies.

Ex-Consultant in Tech's avatar

The interesting question isn’t whether Listen replaces old research vendors. It’s whether it makes research cheap and fast enough that companies start doing 10x more of it. If that happens, this becomes less a substitution play and more a market expansion play.

No posts

Ready for more?